The report on Lord Ahmed's idea of consensual sex is in ...

Started by johnofgwent, November 17, 2020, 05:32:53 PM

« previous - next »

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Borg Refinery

Quote from: T00ts on November 17, 2020, 10:29:22 PM
Who would be authorised to delete it ? Isn't it a public doc?

I've seen it happen so many times you wouldn't believe it. On another forum me and JoG were on, we both saw it happen in real time and some BBC articoe being deleted too...

That was the first time my super cynical streak came out, and as you say sometimes "I wouldn't want to be in your head", which is a fair point, neither do I, I donnt like being cynical but look what you've just witnessed them doing Toots?

Look how they covered up all the reports into sex abuse in ceetain communities over P.C and refused to sanction MP's who called it a hoax etc. From memory, Naz Shah did this, why is she allowed to sit in the commons?

Anyway, it's just awful and I don't have the words, and what's worse, the PC coverup shit and the actions of these scumbags fuel unspeakable racism against innocent 'asians', which is why friends of mine in London as well as family were almost killed by violent racists.

It is all very wrong.

+++

Barry

It hasn't been deleted, T00ts, but the contents are quite sickening, astounding, even.
This will be headlines for a few days, at least.

I think the page JoG shows was deleted has been replaced with this one:
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/402/conduct-committee/news/130536/the-house-of-lords-conduct-committee-has-today-published-a-report-on-the-conduct-of-lord-ahmed/
† The end is nigh †

T00ts

Quote from: Barry on November 17, 2020, 09:59:48 PM
I just downloaded this:
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5801/ldselect/ldcond/170/170.pdf
If anyone can be bothered.

I found the link on the Google cached version of one of the results, as it appears someone is deleting stuff.

Who would be authorised to delete it ? Isn't it a public doc?

Barry

I just downloaded this:
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld5801/ldselect/ldcond/170/170.pdf
If anyone can be bothered.

I found the link on the Google cached version of one of the results, as it appears someone is deleting stuff.
† The end is nigh †

Sheepy

Well no doubt the millions that report cost, it should be seen, at a guess it is already doing the rounds anyway.
Just because I don't say anything, it doesn't mean I haven't noticed!

Borg Refinery

So you blame all Asians for the actions of a minority of Pakistanis, think about it, all asians.

I understand that you have an especial hatred for certain folks given certain horrific events, and believe me I'd kill that POS myself rather than hear of IT getting away with stuff, but 'collective punishment' is wrong.

You can do this with virtually any racial group if you find eniugh examples of what folks have done there. And I'm not denying that some facets of Pakistani culture aren't troubling but saying all Asian cultyre ir heck, even all Pakistanis is just wrong.

As for Lord Ahmed, Pinochet style helicopter drop methinks and same for all paedos regardless of race.

I would personally grab the Muslim rape gangs in prison and have them sent to a Syrian CIA black site... 
+++

T00ts

Quote from: johnofgwent on November 17, 2020, 08:22:13 PM
Ok. To spell it out

I was not (for once) accusing the BBC of mendacity.

I have read the house of lords committee report. It catalogues a series of attempts by a peer of the realm first to cover up, and then undermine the credibility of the victim of, his sexual abuse.

The very same tactics as used by Rotherham's Pakistanis on white underage girls ...

I was referring specifically to the lies published in the Pakistani media at this rapists request. And to the fact a PDF safely on my hard drive has vanished from the government site i retrieved it from.

I'll see if I can find a filesharing site somewhere to upload it ...

Shouldn't he be in court?

johnofgwent

Quote from: Javert on November 17, 2020, 06:09:51 PM
I'm not sure what your point is because the BBC article you just linked clearly states that he was about to be expelled for those issues - there doesn't seem to be a cover up about it as far as I can tell?

Ok. To spell it out

I was not (for once) accusing the BBC of mendacity.

I have read the house of lords committee report. It catalogues a series of attempts by a peer of the realm first to cover up, and then undermine the credibility of the victim of, his sexual abuse.

The very same tactics as used by Rotherham's Pakistanis on white underage girls ...

I was referring specifically to the lies published in the Pakistani media at this rapists request. And to the fact a PDF safely on my hard drive has vanished from the government site i retrieved it from.

I'll see if I can find a filesharing site somewhere to upload it ...
<t>In matters of taxation, Lord Clyde\'s summing up in the 1929 case Inland Revenue v Ayrshire Pullman Services is worth a glance.</t>

T00ts

Quote from: Javert on November 17, 2020, 06:09:51 PM
I'm not sure what your point is because the BBC article you just linked clearly states that he was about to be expelled for those issues - there doesn't seem to be a cover up about it as far as I can tell?

I thought JOG was questioning the mindset.

Javert

Quote from: johnofgwent on November 17, 2020, 05:32:53 PM
RIGHT . This is fascinating... and speaks volumes about what people think they can get away with

First up. Open a browser and search for "house of lords conduct committee lord ahmed".

You will be shown THIS link. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/402/conduct-committee/news/130535/conduct-committe-report-on-lord-ahmed-published/

But if you click it, you will see THIS




Which is interesting, because I have just downloaded the PDF of the findings and if I find they have hidden it I shall liveleak it far and wide.


ANYWAY, It seems according to a BBC Page posted an hour ago https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-54975932 the Ignoble Rotherham Based Ermine Weari9ng Shithead, who has been sitting on red Leather for THREE YEARS arguing his innocence just "resigned" his seat in the Lords about five minutes before he was thrown through the plate glass windows into the Thames for bringing the House into disprepute.

It turns out that the Ignoble Shithead was approached by a woman seeking help to bring a complaint to the Metropolitan Police that she was, whiile in the hands of a "faith healer", subjected to various sexual abuses. But instead of assisting her with formulating a complaint, this piece fo shiot lured her round to his place, drugged her and continued where the faith healder left off.

After THREE YEARS of dodging the findings that he should be removed from the chamber, the Standards Committee ruled yesterday that their findings be made public. And I have them. And it seems that for the first time EVER the committee has recommended the piece of shit be expelled from the house. Hence his "resignation" before they throw him out.

It seems he's telling a quite different story to the Asian Press.  He's telling the "Global Times Of Pakistan" he has left to spend more time with his family as his wife has bowel cancer.

https://globaltimes.pk/why-has-lord-nazir-ahmed-left-the-house-of-lords/

I'm not sure what your point is because the BBC article you just linked clearly states that he was about to be expelled for those issues - there doesn't seem to be a cover up about it as far as I can tell?


T00ts

Quote from: johnofgwent on November 17, 2020, 05:32:53 PM
RIGHT . This is fascinating... and speaks volumes about what people think they can get away with

First up. Open a browser and search for "house of lords conduct committee lord ahmed".

You will be shown THIS link. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/402/conduct-committee/news/130535/conduct-committe-report-on-lord-ahmed-published/

But if you click it, you will see THIS




Which is interesting, because I have just downloaded the PDF of the findings and if I find they have hidden it I shall liveleak it far and wide.


ANYWAY, It seems [size=78%]according to a BBC Page posted an hour ago [/size][size=78%]https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-54975932[/size][size=78%] the [/size][size=78%]Ignoble [/size]Rotherham Based[/size] Peer [/size][size=78%]Shithead, who has been sitting on red Leather for THREE YEARS arguing his innocence just [/size][size=78%]"resigned" his seat in the Lords about five minutes before he was thrown through the plate glass windows into the Thames for bringing the House into disprepute.[/size]

It turns out that the Ignoble Shithead was approached by a woman seeking help to bring a complaint to the Metropolitan Police that she was, whiile in the hands of a "faith healer", subjected to various sexual abuses. But instead of assisting her with formulating a complaint, this piece fo shiot lured her round to his place, drugged her and continued where the faith healder left off.


After THREE YEARS of dodging the findings that he should be removed from the chamber, the Standards Committee ruled yesterday that their findings be made public. And I have them. And it seems that for the first time EVER the committee has recommended the piece of shit be expelled from the house.


Hence his "resignation"


It seems he's telling a quite different story to the Asian Press.


He's telling the "Global Times Of Pakistan" he has left to spend more time with his family as his wife has bowel cancer.


https://globaltimes.pk/why-has-lord-nazir-ahmed-left-the-house-of-lords/

I read an upsetting story just the other day where a daughter abused through childhood by family members, now an adult, told how in her culture these things are hidden. My heart went out to her but her comment revealed something very sinister.

johnofgwent

RIGHT . This is fascinating... and speaks volumes about what people think they can get away with

First up. Open a browser and search for "house of lords conduct committee lord ahmed".

You will be shown THIS link. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/402/conduct-committee/news/130535/conduct-committe-report-on-lord-ahmed-published/

But if you click it, you will see THIS




Which is interesting, because I have just downloaded the PDF of the findings and if I find they have hidden it I shall liveleak it far and wide.


ANYWAY, It seems according to a BBC Page posted an hour ago https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-54975932 the Ignoble Rotherham Based Ermine Weari9ng Shithead, who has been sitting on red Leather for THREE YEARS arguing his innocence just "resigned" his seat in the Lords about five minutes before he was thrown through the plate glass windows into the Thames for bringing the House into disprepute.

It turns out that the Ignoble Shithead was approached by a woman seeking help to bring a complaint to the Metropolitan Police that she was, whiile in the hands of a "faith healer", subjected to various sexual abuses. But instead of assisting her with formulating a complaint, this piece fo shiot lured her round to his place, drugged her and continued where the faith healder left off.

After THREE YEARS of dodging the findings that he should be removed from the chamber, the Standards Committee ruled yesterday that their findings be made public. And I have them. And it seems that for the first time EVER the committee has recommended the piece of shit be expelled from the house. Hence his "resignation" before they throw him out.

It seems he's telling a quite different story to the Asian Press.  He's telling the "Global Times Of Pakistan" he has left to spend more time with his family as his wife has bowel cancer.

https://globaltimes.pk/why-has-lord-nazir-ahmed-left-the-house-of-lords/
Mod Edit
<t>In matters of taxation, Lord Clyde\'s summing up in the 1929 case Inland Revenue v Ayrshire Pullman Services is worth a glance.</t>