Off topic thread (to the tower)

[cromwell]

Everywhere has some sort of employment, it's about not being fussy

No not everywhere has sufficient employment for everyone and if everybody moved to the south east where jobs are plentiful how will that work,you know nothing about many parts of this country or the people who live there but when you do comment its in the usual despicable manner you reserve for others like the disabled.

[cromwell]

Everywhere has some sort of employment, it's about not being fussy

No not everywhere has sufficient employment for everyone and if everybody moved to the south east where jobs are plentiful how will that work,you know nothing about many parts of this country or the people who live there but when you do comment its in the usual despicable manner you reserve for others like the disabled.

[Churchill]

I moved 250 miles from my home town and family back in the 70's to find work , wife left her own country to find work and still working

[Wiggles]

All very well if you live somewhere with good employment.

Everywhere has some sort of employment, it's about not being fussy

[cromwell]

No, you could act the man and find another job.

All very well if you live somewhere with good employment.

[Wiggles]

No, you could act the man and find another job.

Yep, basically what I said  :hattip

[Wiggles]

And when you read some of what you post does its objectives remind you of any political party or ideals?

Yes, mine

[Borchester]

So if I got married, had a couple of kids and 3 years later I was made redundant, you'd advise me to do what, strangle the kids? Put them up for adoption? Sell them into slavery perhaps so the state needn't give me so much money?



 

No, you could act the man and find another job.

[cromwell]

I am perfectly aware that we need children. The problem being that children born from adults that can't afford to raise them, are generally speaking the futures no hopers. The responsible adults that can afford to bring up their kids will indefinitely raise them properly,and these are the children we need. Perhaps not the politically correct way of thinking, but reality knows I am right.



Regarding your comment about euthanasia. I am a big fan of euthanasia, both voluntary and involuntary, and in a world occupied by nearly 8 billion people, I don't see why it is an issue

And when you read some of what you post does its objectives remind you of any political party or ideals?

[Wiggles]

Wow aren't you the charmer,I've worked all my life and still do now even though I'm past retirement age,I had a period of illness and drew benefits and why shouldn't I?



Those brats you speak of are this nations future and may end up supporting you as previous generations of brats? have done for others.



Anyone can fall on hard times or suffer illness and if kids are given false expectations of their prospects it's not their fault but a system sometimes designed to mask unemployment figures.



Also we are entering an age of greater automation and robots so finding gainful employment  harder so what's your solution?



Oh I know probably euthanasia.

I am perfectly aware that we need children. The problem being that children born from adults that can't afford to raise them, are generally speaking the futures no hopers. The responsible adults that can afford to bring up their kids will indefinitely raise them properly,and these are the children we need. Perhaps not the politically correct way of thinking, but reality knows I am right.



Regarding your comment about euthanasia. I am a big fan of euthanasia, both voluntary and involuntary, and in a world occupied by nearly 8 billion people, I don't see why it is an issue

[cromwell]

£250k to raise a child, bo110cks. Who genuinely thinks it costs £12k a year to bring a up a kid, and even if it does, why should the tax payer foot the bill. If your made redundant, get yourself down the employment agency and do some work, don't expect me to pay for your brats

Wow aren't you the charmer,I've worked all my life and still do now even though I'm past retirement age,I had a period of illness and drew benefits and why shouldn't I?



Those brats you speak of are this nations future and may end up supporting you as previous generations of brats? have done for others.



Anyone can fall on hard times or suffer illness and if kids are given false expectations of their prospects it's not their fault but a system sometimes designed to mask unemployment figures.



Also we are entering an age of greater automation and robots so finding gainful employment  harder so what's your solution?



Oh I know probably euthanasia.

[Wiggles]

So if I got married, had a couple of kids and 3 years later I was made redundant, you'd advise me to do what, strangle the kids? Put them up for adoption? Sell them into slavery perhaps so the state needn't give me so much money?



 After all, people who can't afford them shouldn't have them should they?



And how many young couples have approximately  £250,000 in the bank to raise a child to the age of 21? Because they are the only ones who can really afford them according to you.

£250k to raise a child, bo110cks. Who genuinely thinks it costs £12k a year to bring a up a kid, and even if it does, why should the tax payer foot the bill. If your made redundant, get yourself down the employment agency and do some work, don't expect me to pay for your brats.

[Calico Jack]

It's the fact he ever received £3k a month in the first place  annoys me. I am adamantly opposed to any child benefit or free day care, as I believe anyone who can't afford to have children shouldn't have them. Having kids should not be a right

So if I got married, had a couple of kids and 3 years later I was made redundant, you'd advise me to do what, strangle the kids? Put them up for adoption? Sell them into slavery perhaps so the state needn't give me so much money?



 After all, people who can't afford them shouldn't have them should they?



And how many young couples have approximately  £250,000 in the bank to raise a child to the age of 21? Because they are the only ones who can really afford them according to you.

[Wiggles]

No you are not you are a particularly nasty Troll.

You are not respectful, and you know it. For a start, referring to me as a nasty troll is far from respectful. A troll is someone who says things they don't believe for a reaction. I on the other hand I believe everything I say. You believe that what you think is the norm, in my world the beliefs I have are considered quite moderate, HONESTLY !



You did not give an answer to my last thread. The person "A" and person "B" scenario. Is it because you know I am right ?

[Borchester]

The fact you don't know why disabled are different shows just how nasty and pig ignorant you are.

Bit of lefty fascism there Pappy if you don't mind my saying so. Are you suggesting that the mentally and physically handicapped are some sort of untermensch to be kept under the benign but firm control of chaps like you who best know how to run their lives for them?