Pfizer BNT162b2 Trials Incomplete - Crimes Under Nuremberg Code

Started by Scott777, February 04, 2021, 04:22:00 PM

« previous - next »

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Scott777

Quote from: patman post on February 04, 2021, 06:04:33 PM
But being an emergency, evaluation and investigation were speeded up and the vaccines were judged fit to use.
Israel's speedy vaccination programme looks likely to be completed by mid-year. Initial results are looking good...
"Judged fit to use."  Maybe, judged by politicians.  Not by the trials.  They are still defined as experimental, and the Nuremberg Code applies.  And the speeding up is irrelevant, because the date of completion has not changed.
Those princes who have done great things have held good faith of little account, and have known how to craftily circumvent the intellect of men.  Niccolò Machiavelli.

Javert

Quote from: Scott777 on February 04, 2021, 05:18:21 PM
Very true.  However, the 'emergency OK' doesn't change anything.  In WW2, the Nazis said it was ok and necessary to exterminate Jews.

You do realise the vaccine is optional and you don't have to take it?

Borchester

Quote from: Scott777 on February 04, 2021, 04:22:00 PM
After watching a video on Youtube, I looked into this a bit deeper, the facts are available for anyone to see.  The Pfizer mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) is listed on the US National Library of Medicine (part of the National Institutes of Health) (see link below) as part of ongoing trials which will complete in January 2023.  That means it is still experimental.

Under the Nuremberg Code (1947), any experimental medical treatment requires informed consent, and cannot be coerced.  If anyone taking it is not given information on the incomplete ongoing trials, then they have not given informed consent, and anyone administering it is committing a crime under the Nuremberg Code.  Any employer who tries to coerce an employee into taking it is also committing a crime under the Nuremberg Code.

To anyone who has taken it, you are taking part in a genetic experiment.  Good luck with that.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728?term=BNT162b2&cntry=US&draw=2&rank=1

Good point. Little bear probably looked at her vast brood of fit, happy children and thought bugger that for a game of soldiers. I am not testing this drug on meine kinder, we will use the Britische Schweine as guinea pigs first.

And she might be onto something. I had the shot on Friday and have not stopped farting since. No wonder Shell's shares are plummeting. Who needs gas fields when the nations cottontops are producing so much for nothing?
Algerie Francais !

patman post

But being an emergency, evaluation and investigation were speeded up and the vaccines were judged fit to use.
Israel's speedy vaccination programme looks likely to be completed by mid-year. Initial results are looking good...
On climate change — we're talking, we're beginning to act, but we're still not doing enough...

Scott777

Quote from: patman post on February 04, 2021, 05:10:21 PM
The dates given are "estimated".
But in any case, the Pfizer vaccine has been given an "emergency OK" in the US and around the world...
Very true.  However, the 'emergency OK' doesn't change anything.  In WW2, the Nazis said it was ok and necessary to exterminate Jews.
Those princes who have done great things have held good faith of little account, and have known how to craftily circumvent the intellect of men.  Niccolò Machiavelli.

patman post

The dates given are "estimated".
But in any case, the Pfizer vaccine has been given an "emergency OK" in the US and around the world...
On climate change — we're talking, we're beginning to act, but we're still not doing enough...

Scott777

After watching a video on Youtube, I looked into this a bit deeper, the facts are available for anyone to see.  The Pfizer mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) is listed on the US National Library of Medicine (part of the National Institutes of Health) (see link below) as part of ongoing trials which will complete in January 2023.  That means it is still experimental.

Under the Nuremberg Code (1947), any experimental medical treatment requires informed consent, and cannot be coerced.  If anyone taking it is not given information on the incomplete ongoing trials, then they have not given informed consent, and anyone administering it is committing a crime under the Nuremberg Code.  Any employer who tries to coerce an employee into taking it is also committing a crime under the Nuremberg Code.

To anyone who has taken it, you are taking part in a genetic experiment.  Good luck with that.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728?term=BNT162b2&cntry=US&draw=2&rank=1
Those princes who have done great things have held good faith of little account, and have known how to craftily circumvent the intellect of men.  Niccolò Machiavelli.