Saddo Can't deplores transgender activism

Started by johnofgwent, September 19, 2021, 03:30:23 PM

« previous - next »

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Barry

Sex is immutable, transgender is mental illness.

If people could get that we could all get on with our lives.
† The end is nigh †

johnofgwent

As far as I can make out ...


The Labour Party, or at least it's champion fence sitter leader, is coming under fire from trans gender activists and those who defend party members rights to self identify as a teapot ...


https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/02/04/keir-starmer-labour-party-transphobia-trans-rosie-duffield-molly-mulready/


But there seem to be some right nasty buggers in that  group, and they are not remotely pleased with one party member in particular who has chosen to state she quite firmly believes only those in possession of a cervix should be allowed to call themselves a woman.


https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2021-09-19/canterbury-mp-forced-to-stay-away-from-party-conference-after-extremist-threats


Now, I don't give a rat's arse what Labour party policy is, as the chances of me having to decide whether to use the urinal or the sink in a Labour party conference just isn't going to happen.


But I'm guessing Eddie Izzard and a bunch of dodgy drag queens aren't happy.


So this has forced Saddo to stand up and declare that all views are welcome at the conference.


https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/newslondon/sadiq-khan-urges-e2-80-98calm-debate-e2-80-99-as-mp-avoids-labour-conference-due-to-threats/ar-AAOBD4Z


Yeah right.


But I cannot help laughing at two absurdities ...


First, that Saddo Can't is actually defending the right of the "it can have a dick, or a place to stick one, there are no other alternatives" brigade.


Second, that the MP in question, having decided it is better to QUIETLY stay away from party conference, should choose to enunciate her decision to that paragon of discretion, the GB News Desk !!!!
<t>In matters of taxation, Lord Clyde\'s summing up in the 1929 case Inland Revenue v Ayrshire Pullman Services is worth a glance.</t>