Natural immunity

[Scott777]

The journal of Immunology articles published at the time the pox became widespread suggest 60-90 days which is about that of the jab.

Be precise.  Does the journal say natural immunity only lasts 60-90 days, or is it only referring to antibodies?

[cromwell]

Thank feck for that . 

[johnofgwent]

Having the virus would give some natural protection against reinfection but there has been some debate on exactly how long that lasts . Having the jab is not coercion nor control , its an extra layer of protection and the more protected we all are the better for all .

The journal of Immunology articles published at the time the pox became widespread suggest 60-90 days which is about that of the jab.

[Streetwalker]

 I give up with you.

Thank feck for that .   

[Scott777]

So you think the worlds governments are all in on the great covid conspiracy to line their own pockets , 

This is called a strawman.  It has 2 huge flaws:

1. Not ALL the governments agree that the vaccine protects the unvaccinated.  You are welcome to say how many do, and explain how you know.  (Did you ask them all?)

2. If many governments do believe this, it still doesn't mean they conspired.  They can have independent reasons for claiming it, or for believing it.  For example, they may trust the WHO or the CDC.  Or they may be after the massive profits that vaccines provide.

The only reasonable conclusion you can make is that politicians are not to be trusted.  😱  SHOCKING (if you are a child).

[Scott777]

The only issue is that there are some people who are still at risk and reducing the risk of them getting it means the rest of us get jabbed .

🤣  No, mate.  You failed to provide your evidence before.  I give up with you.

[Streetwalker]

You have swallowed the government line, hook line and sinker. And yet, you know the government lie about everything.
You can't trust them on this either SW. Utter lies to cater to their pockets, wake up, mate!

So you think the worlds governments are all in on the great covid conspiracy to line their own pockets , Dont you think they are doing that anyway ? 
No objections from any opposition leaders anywhere in the world  just  a few internet crazies . 


Come on  Barry your smarter than that 

[Barry]

Yes great news isnt it . The only issue is that there are some people who are still at risk and reducing the risk of them getting it means the rest of us get jabbed .

You have swallowed the government line, hook line and sinker. And yet, you know the government lie about everything.
You can't trust them on this either SW. Utter lies to cater to their pockets, wake up, mate!

[Streetwalker]

Now, it causes cold symptoms, so, few people are at risk.  If you are not at any risk, then a vaccine cannot reduce that.

Yes great news isnt it . The only issue is that there are some people who are still at risk and reducing the risk of them getting it means the rest of us get jabbed . 

[Scott777]

Having the jab is [...] an extra layer of protection and the more protected we all are the better for all .

Now, it causes cold symptoms, so, few people are at risk.  If you are not at any risk, then a vaccine cannot reduce that.

[Streetwalker]

Two stories currently highlighting that natural immunity after infection is being ignored by the authorities.
Sajid Javid directly challenged on mandatory coronavirus jabs by unvaccinated NHS doctor

Having Covid gave tennis star vaccine exemption - lawyers

The authorities prefer a one size fits all approach, as it gives them something they can mark on their digital systems, which can be used on their vaccine passes. Anyone in favour of this sort of unscientific coercion and control?

Anyone who has had the disease previously could argue, quite reasonably, that they do not need a jab - just as Steve James just did.

Perhaps this is a precursor to the government backing down on sacking unjabbed staff on April fools day?

Having the virus would give some natural protection against reinfection but there has been some debate on exactly how long that lasts . Having the jab is not coercion nor control , its an extra layer of protection and the more protected we all are the better for all . 

[Barry]

Two stories currently highlighting that natural immunity after infection is being ignored by the authorities.
Sajid Javid directly challenged on mandatory coronavirus jabs by unvaccinated NHS doctor

Having Covid gave tennis star vaccine exemption - lawyers

The authorities prefer a one size fits all approach, as it gives them something they can mark on their digital systems, which can be used on their vaccine passes. Anyone in favour of this sort of unscientific coercion and control?

Anyone who has had the disease previously could argue, quite reasonably, that they do not need a jab - just as Steve James just did.

Perhaps this is a precursor to the government backing down on sacking unjabbed staff on April fools day?