Starmer doing donuts

Started by Streetwalker, July 27, 2022, 07:11:29 AM

« previous - next »

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Sheepy

Quote from: Good old on July 28, 2022, 10:12:39 AM
And that thought gives you an organism I take it.


No, just a much wider vision which it seems the Westminster party do everything they can to dull down. 
Just because I don't say anything, it doesn't mean I haven't noticed!

Good old

Quote from: Sheepy on July 28, 2022, 09:05:48 AM
Which is probably why it doesn't make any difference who anyone votes for Good Old.
And that thought gives you an organism I take it.

Sheepy

Which is probably why it doesn't make any difference who anyone votes for Good Old. 
Just because I don't say anything, it doesn't mean I haven't noticed!

Sheepy

Now by all means call me crazy, but if you vote for a commodity broker free for all after a big Pharma free for all, the plebs have no choice but choose between heat and eat, which will send inflation soaring as everything rises in line with how the Westminster party voted, so the BOE raises interest rates to stop inflation because the plebs have no other choice, but if you channel all your spending on just trying to stay alive and interest rates rise to stop that, don't you then crash the rest of the economy because nobody has anything left to spend in said economy. Which is why during the big covid take over, the government were handing out money to save the rest of the economy creating another massive debt. 
Just because I don't say anything, it doesn't mean I haven't noticed!

Sheepy

Quote from: srb7677 on July 27, 2022, 08:44:05 AM
Some of us in the party at the time always knew what the direction of travel would be under Starmer. We saw him attempting to lie to us, pretending to be a socialist. We knew he was lying to us. We knew all his local acolytes who promised socialism combined with electability were lying to us. They'd spent most of their time fighting socialism after all. But we saw with dismay all the gullible fools in the party who were being taken in by this liar. The ones who bought into his lies.

Once he gained his position with their support he quickly reversed on all his lies and turned the party into something that no man or woman of principle on the left could possibly support. And we all left in disgust.

In this year's locals - for the first time ever in my ward - they had to resort to using Royal Mail to post their leaflets through our doors, because they no longer had the manpower in the form of willing member volunteers to do it themselves. This not only tells you about the collapse in local party membership with the only ones left being those on the make and unwilling to put in the footwork. It also reveals something else. Someone, somewhere is providing the funding necessary to post thousands of leaflets to thousands of addresses, because that kind of money never used to be readily available.

For the few, not the many?
The Westminster party will do as the globalists tell them they will do, as at the moment they are in the middle of making fortunes out of crashing economies the politicians will be told they will concentrate on telling people it is all about economics and rebuilding economies, although they actually all voted for the present situation the illusion is they will need to show they can fix it. Which of course never actually happens they just create more debt.
Just because I don't say anything, it doesn't mean I haven't noticed!

srb7677

Some of us in the party at the time always knew what the direction of travel would be under Starmer. We saw him attempting to lie to us, pretending to be a socialist. We knew he was lying to us. We knew all his local acolytes who promised socialism combined with electability were lying to us. They'd spent most of their time fighting socialism after all. But we saw with dismay all the gullible fools in the party who were being taken in by this liar. The ones who bought into his lies.

Once he gained his position with their support he quickly reversed on all his lies and turned the party into something that no man or woman of principle on the left could possibly support. And we all left in disgust.

In this year's locals - for the first time ever in my ward - they had to resort to using Royal Mail to post their leaflets through our doors, because they no longer had the manpower in the form of willing member volunteers to do it themselves. This not only tells you about the collapse in local party membership with the only ones left being those on the make and unwilling to put in the footwork. It also reveals something else. Someone, somewhere is providing the funding necessary to post thousands of leaflets to thousands of addresses, because that kind of money never used to be readily available.

For the few, not the many?
We are not all in the same boat. We are in the same storm. Some of us have yachts. Some of us have canoes. Some of us are drowning.

Streetwalker

Labour leadership debate: First TV showdown UNCUT - BBC Newsnight - YouTube


19.30  The contenders are asked about Corbyns current policy .  Starmer raises his hand to the suggestion of Nationalisation of Water and electric 

johnofgwent

https://www.gbnews.uk/news/diane-abbott-aims-dig-at-keir-starmer-over-nationalisation-approach-it-is-agreed-labour-policy/344062

Great minds ?

No, not hers....

I came here to report the same thing. I guess at least one of our regular contributors who isn't a party member any more will say "I told you so" and they'd be right but somehow  it doesn't feel any better to know it.

Starmer has succeeded where few others could and in a deed few would have thought it possible.

In finally opening his mouth and getting off the fence, he has seemingly shown his contempt for the policy of the party he is supposed to be leading.

But far worse than that, he has made the party's second biggest white-hating racist, a woman renowned for press interviews so bad you have to call them train-wrecks because to call them "car crashes" just isn't descriptive enough, a woman who only got the job of shadow home secretary because no one else would have it, a woman his predecessor shagged and invited colleagues round to his place to show off his eagerness to shag a black, appear to have a competence beyond her shoe-size IQ in her criticism of him for not supporting party policy.

Did he make his "pragmatism" clear when he stood up and expressed interest in being Corbyns replacement ? That's a genuine question by the way, I really don't know I ignored the whole business but if any who paid into the labour coffers knows of a link from his campaign I'd like to see it.


<t>In matters of taxation, Lord Clyde\'s summing up in the 1929 case Inland Revenue v Ayrshire Pullman Services is worth a glance.</t>

Streetwalker

Diane Abbott in huge swipe at Starmer over U-turn as Labour self-implodes into civil war | Politics | News | Express.co.uk


Nationlisation of the railways and public services probably the one policy labour have come up with that will actually get them some votes and he ditches it .

Then he says he will

Then he say he wont

Then its rail not mail ,might do energy and thinking about water   

Corbynite Abbott has a dig at Starmer for ditching the popular labour party policy and he puts himself on the news to clarify the position .
Only he didn't , or did he ? He blames the pandemic for his u-turn ,u-turn  , he may as well join the conservatives ,I think he would be a good fit