Your not British

[Streetwalker]

Read paragraph 7 of the judgement.  The court started with a false assumption that she was a citizen of Bangladesh.  And under Bangladesh law her birth only made her a Bangladesh citizen IF her parents had so registered her with the embassy or in Bangladesh.  They didn't

Well we will see if there is an appeal if the court got it wrong but my reading of it is they didn't 

[papasmurf]

Yet they ALWAYS get accidentally exposed to other prisoners. Please tell me you aren't as green as you make out to be.

Nick personal insults again by you. What are you on about. They are kept in different wings of prisons.

[Nick]

Muslims are kept separate in British prisons.

Yet they ALWAYS get accidentally exposed to other prisoners. Please tell me you aren't as green as you make out to be. 

[Unlucky4Sum]

Muslims are kept separate in British prisons.

Another made up fable?  

[Unlucky4Sum]

Does she actually realise what will happen to her if she comes back and is put in the big house? She'll have Bee Smith pegging her to within an inch of her life, terrorists don't get an easy life in prison. I think I'd sit out my days where she was if I were her, but I guess she has form for making bad choices.

Indeed but we can't make that choice for her

[papasmurf]

Does she actually realise what will happen to her if she comes back and is put in the big house? She'll have Bee Smith pegging her to within an inch of her life, terrorists don't get an easy life in prison. I think I'd sit out my days where she was if I were her, but I guess she has form for making bad choices.

Muslims are kept separate in British prisons.

[Nick]

Read paragraph 7 of the judgement.  The court started with a false assumption that she was a citizen of Bangladesh.  And under Bangladesh law her birth only made her a Bangladesh citizen IF her parents had so registered her with the embassy or in Bangladesh.  They didn't.

That SIAC court has limited scope and powers, higher courts won't be so constrained.  You know how this is going to end up but the Tories are desperate not to have that happen on their watch.

Does she actually realise what will happen to her if she comes back and is put in the big house? She'll have Bee Smith pegging her to within an inch of her life, terrorists don't get an easy life in prison. I think I'd sit out my days where she was if I were her, but I guess she has form for making bad choices. 

[Unlucky4Sum]

Not really . A passport is just conformation of citizenship , a travel visa .You dont need a passport to be a citizen of a country . Other documents can prove citizenship like birth certificates . Hers would have her parents name on it with their place of birth making her (again under Bangledeshi law ) a Bangladeshi citizen .

If what Javid did was illegal the court would have said so , it didn't , so its not .

Read paragraph 7 of the judgement.  The court started with a false assumption that she was a citizen of Bangladesh.  And under Bangladesh law her birth only made her a Bangladesh citizen IF her parents had so registered her with the embassy or in Bangladesh.  They didn't.

That SIAC court has limited scope and powers, higher courts won't be so constrained.  You know how this is going to end up but the Tories are desperate not to have that happen on their watch. 

[Streetwalker]

No it does not because she hadn't applied when Javid made his decision nor was there any proof Bangladesh would grant it to her.  So he illegally made her stateless.  And not just under international/ECtHR law, because he didn't properly check his decision was 'contrary to natural justice' so illegal under UK law. 

Javid wanted the kudos first and justice second.  So many of the then cabinet are the same

Not really . A passport is just conformation of citizenship , a travel visa .You dont need a passport to be a citizen of a country . Other documents can prove citizenship like birth certificates . Hers would have her parents name on it with their place of birth making her (again under Bangledeshi law ) a Bangladeshi citizen .

If what Javid did was illegal the court would have said so , it didn't , so its not .

[johnofgwent]

Any chance of you arguing your case with intelligent points?

I just did. You've not had to face down a nutter intent on killing you. It shows.

[Unlucky4Sum]

I wonder if the people a certain Millwall supporter had to protect from a bunch of machete wielding fucking scum would agree with you.

Bottom line she willingly went to part her legs for a bunch of terrorist bastards and married one with DUTCH citizenship. She's a widow of a Dutch citizen who was still Dutch when the yanks rightly dumped a cluster bomb on him. If she wants to argue her case to get back in anywhere it should be to go to fucking Amsterdam not back here.

Any chance of you arguing your case with intelligent points?

[Unlucky4Sum]

I wouldn't post a link without reading it and yes it does make exceptions one of them being a dual national with the UK who 'may apply for a dual Nationality certificate ' further 'this certificate makes it legal to hold a Bangladeshi passport in addition to a foriegn passport '

That she hasn't applied or what Bangladesh does with any application is niether here nor there ,the fact remains she could which makes the UK decision on removing the British passport legal (as upheld by the courts ) .

No it does not because she hadn't applied when Javid made his decision nor was there any proof Bangladesh would grant it to her.  So he illegally made her stateless.  And not just under international/ECtHR law, because he didn't properly check his decision was 'contrary to natural justice' so illegal under UK law.  

Javid wanted the kudos first and justice second.  So many of the then cabinet are the same

[johnofgwent]

You didn't even read your own link did you as it shows you're wrong with those dual citizenship is not permitted except with exceptions where a procedure is followed and Bangladesh agrees.  The procedure wasn't followed and Bangladesh doesn't agree.

Not that it's an official Bangladesh source either

I wonder if the people a certain Millwall supporter had to protect from a bunch of machete wielding fucking scum would agree with you.

Bottom line she willingly went to part her legs for a bunch of terrorist bastards and married one with DUTCH citizenship. She's a widow of a Dutch citizen who was still Dutch when the yanks rightly dumped a cluster bomb on him. If she wants to argue her case to get back in anywhere it should be to go to fucking amsterdam not back here.

[Streetwalker]

You didn't even read your own link did you as it shows you're wrong with those dual citizenship is not permitted except with exceptions where a procedure is followed and Bangladesh agrees.  The procedure wasn't followed and Bangladesh doesn't agree.

Not that it's an official Bangladesh source either

I wouldn't post a link without reading it and yes it does make exceptions one of them being a dual national with the UK who 'may apply for a dual Nationality certificate ' further 'this certificate makes it legal to hold a Bangladeshi passport in addition to a foriegn passport '

That she hasn't applied or what Bangladesh does with any application is niether here nor there ,the fact remains she could which makes the UK decision on removing the British passport legal (as upheld by the courts ) .

[Unlucky4Sum]

Yes very .  According to the law (citizen act 1951) in Bangladesh anyone born to at least one Bangladeshi parent (she has 2) is considered a Bangladeshi citizen .

Bangladesh - Dual Citizenship (dualcitizenshipreport.org)

You didn't even read your own link did you as it shows you're wrong with those dual citizenship is not permitted except with exceptions where a procedure is followed and Bangladesh agrees.  The procedure wasn't followed and Bangladesh doesn't agree.

Not that it's an official Bangladesh source either