No to Rwanda

[Nick]

Nick you perceive me to be disabled, yet you continuously attack, abuse, and ridicule me. That is now approaching disability hate crime which is a police matter. (The evidence is here on the forum.)

No, I perceive you to be autistic, which I'm 100% sure you are. You're the one inventing disability hate crime and goodness knows what else. Can you confirm you're happy to post on here? If not I'll suspend your account. 

[papasmurf]

You really live in cloud cuckoo land.

Nick you perceive me to be disabled, yet you continuously attack, abuse, and ridicule me. That is now approaching disability hate crime which is a police matter. (The evidence is here on the forum.)

[Nick]

Nick no US lawyer is involved. It takes time, (not by me,) to go legally go through all the emails addresses you so kindly set me in order to get Borchester's home address, which I will not know and don't want to know either. Then Borchester can be sued, and the way you have been abusing me you as well.

You really live in cloud cuckoo land. 

[papasmurf]

Speaking of tribunals, how's your court case against Borky going? Your US lawyer still taking notes from this forum? And you wonder why nobody believes a word you say.

Nick no US lawyer is involved. It takes time, (not by me,) to go legally go through all the emails addresses you so kindly set me in order to get Borchester's home address, which I will not know and don't want to know either. Then Borchester can be sued, and the way you have been abusing me you as well.

[Nick]

Nick, the judgement does that.  You don't like it because you can't be bothered to read the judgement and the reasons for it.
You obviously have no idea how long and detailed legal judgments are. (Even the tribunals I have won resulted in box folders full of documents from the tribunals service, at the end of the cases.)

Speaking of tribunals, how's your court case against Borky going? Your US lawyer still taking notes from this forum? And you wonder why nobody believes a word you say. 

[papasmurf]

So as usual you can't prove anything.

Nick, the judgement does that.  You don't like it because you can't be bothered to read the judgement and the reasons for it.
You obviously have no idea how long and detailed legal judgments are. (Even the tribunals I have won resulted in box folders full of documents from the tribunals service, at the end of the cases.) 

[Nick]

Yes it is Nick in depth and detail, which is why the judgement against the government . It isn't  a paragraph it is reams of referenced evidence.

So as usual you can't prove anything. 

[papasmurf]

Not it's not, and if you think it is quote the paragraph.

Yes it is Nick in depth and detail, which is why the judgement against the government . It isn't  a paragraph it is reams of referenced evidence.

[Nick]

Why they would be unsafe in Rwanda is detailed in the link to the judgement. I suggest you read it in full.

Not it's not, and if you think it is quote the paragraph. 

[Scott777]

Why they would be unsafe in Rwanda is detailed in the link to the judgement.

I don't think it is.  If it is, why is it so hard for you to say the reason?  I just knocked down your human rights argument, and you agreed we have our own issues with that.  You carry on dodging an explanation.  I'll go and have some coffee.  Let me know if you can smell it.

[papasmurf]

As far as your evidence goes, UK is already as bad.  So then the question remains, why would immigrants, who WANT to come here, be unsafe in Rwanda?  You switched from posts about them being sent to their homeland, to talking about human rights in Rwanda.

Why they would be unsafe in Rwanda is detailed in the link to the judgement. I suggest you read it in full.

[Scott777]

Why is Britain getting as bad as Rwanda? (Not a trick question.)

As far as your evidence goes, UK is already as bad.  So then the question remains, why would immigrants, who WANT to come here, be unsafe in Rwanda?  You switched from posts about them being sent to their homeland, to talking about human rights in Rwanda.

[papasmurf]

It's not lies, it's based on your posts. And BTH, they contain zero substance, so I afford my self the right to make my own conclusions. If you don't like it then qualify your posts.

Nick the link to the judgement is full of substance, that you can't be bothered to read it is YOUR problem. 

[Nick]

Nick you really do need to stop telling lies about me, frankly you appear to know eff all about Rwanda and neither does Suella Braverman. Telling gigantic porkies about Rwanda being a safe country, it isn't  safe country for it's own citizens.


Fact check: How safe is Rwanda for migrants? – DW – 06/23/2022

It's not lies, it's based on your posts. And BTH, they contain zero substance, so I afford my self the right to make my own conclusions. If you don't like it then qualify your posts. 

[Nick]

Why is Britain getting as bad as Rwanda? (Not a trick question.)

Quid pro quo, Smurf. You give nothing you get nothing.