Reform UK Under Pressure To Prove All Its Candidates Were Real People

[Streetwalker]

Guardian



Even if they are all real, the fact they had so many 'paper candidates' and many didn't bother campaigning is ridiculous.

As was explained at the time ,the short notice of the election left them little choice than to put forward paper candidates  if they were to give the electorate the opportunity to vote for the party . The very nature of a 'paper candidate' is that they lend their name to the ballot but don't campaign , attend hustings or the like . 

[Borg Refinery]

Doubt raised about election hopefuls who stood without providing photos, biographies or contact details

Reform UK has come under pressure to provide evidence its candidates at the general election were all real people after doubts were raised about a series of hopefuls who stood without providing any photos, biographies or contact details.

Reform insists every one of its 609 candidates on 4 July were real, while accepting that some were in effect "paper candidates" who did no campaigning, and were there simply to help increase the party's vote share.

However, after seeing details about the apparently complete lack of information about some candidates, who the Guardian is not naming, the Liberal Democrats called on Reform to provide details about them.

A Liberal Democrat source said: "This doesn't sound right and Reform should come clean with evidence. We need Reform to show who they are. People need to have faith in the democratic process."

A series of candidates listed on the Nigel Farage-led party's election website only show their name and the constituency they stood in, without any information about them, or contact details beyond a generic regional email address.

Many of these people have no visible online presence, and did not appear to do any campaigning. Photographs of the electoral counts for some of the relevant constituencies show that the Reform candidate was the only person not to attend.

Under electoral rules, the only details that need to be given about the candidate is their full name and the constituency where they live. They must all have an agent, and be nominated by 10 local voters.

With some of the Reform candidates, it is not clear if they are listed on the electoral register for the area where they are standing – which in a few cases is hundreds of miles from the constituency in question. One person with the same name and location of a candidate denied it was them.

While there is no evidence any of the candidates are fake, if that turned out to be true, it would be a serious electoral offence. Reform was keen to win as big a share of the national vote as possible, which is helped by a full slate of candidates. Some of the seemingly invisible candidates won several thousand votes.


A Reform source said: "All our candidates are categorically real. Given the rush, a few are just paper candidates and didn't campaign. Some people began as paper candidates but then did campaign, and one of these – James McMurdock in South Basildon and East Thurrock – ended up winning his seat."

The Guardian has also learned that one Reform candidate suspected of being fake, in part because his official election photo looked AI-generated, is a real person.

The suspicions about Mark Matlock, who won 1,758 votes in Clapham and Brixton Hill in south London, were compounded when he did not show for the election count, with sceptics also pointing to an apparent lack of any photographs of him campaigning.

Guardian



Even if they are all real, the fact they had so many 'paper candidates' and many didn't bother campaigning is ridiculous.