Peer Reviewed Paper on Self Assembling Nano-Structures in mRNA 'Vaccines'

[Unlucky4Sum]

An article dated 8th December 2023 refutes an article published on 2nd September 2024.

They must have had their crystal balls out Stevie.

Or perhaps it was a TLDR for you. It was an hour's reading.

And less of the "utter hypocrisy", there's a good chap. Try and behave nicely.

Had you read it you would see he is just repeating in Sept 24 what he admits he was posting 'it's been almost 1 year' before.  IE before his stance was comprehensively refuted in December 2023.

That your tame idiot keeps repeat publishing his vaccine BS doesn't require it to be repeat debunked each time.  He's a liar and I'm not sure about you [/K MacColl mode].

[Barry]

An article dated 8th December 2023 refutes an article published on 2nd September 2024. 

They must have had their crystal balls out Stevie.

Or perhaps it was a TLDR for you. It was an hour's reading.

And less of the "utter hypocrisy", there's a good chap. Try and behave nicely.

[Unlucky4Sum]

This is what you do when you can't refute the content.
Classic SteveK

Actually I can but first I chose to point out the utter hypocrisy of your post.

Here have your source comprehensively debunked:  https://science.feedback.org/review/steve-kirschs-claim-new-zealand-data-shows-covid-vaccines-killed-millions-flawed-analysis/ 

'CONCLUSION

Kirsch's analysis of a subset of New Zealand vaccination data is methodologically flawed and makes unjustified assumptions about the data, such as by claiming the data represent a random sample, when no evidence was provided to show this was the case. It also cherry-picked the data it presented, implying that the rise in mortality seen in the elderly also applied to other age groups.

In fact, this rise was limited to the elderly; no significant changes in mortality in children and younger adults occurred in New Zealand between 2020 and 2022'

[Barry]

oh the irony.  Just look at the bulk of your post attacking the messengers

This is what you do when you can't refute the content.
Classic SteveK

[Unlucky4Sum]

It's a common tactic to attack the author rather than refute the content.
Try refuting the content.
Remember that the jab manufacturers are very wealthy and powerful and will do anything to defend their product, even when proven liable. As AstraZeneca would rather do, as the UK's first £200 billion company, rather than pay the Jab injured what they are due.
Kirsh is a very bright chap, worth listening to.

oh the irony.  Just look at the bulk of your post attacking the messengers

[Unlucky4Sum]

UPDATE

Unlike some people of this forum, I'm prepared to hold my hands up and say when the info might not be as solid as it first appeared.  I . .

[Barry]

That is not a New Zealand article it is just another piece by that widely discredited nutjob Steve Kirsh

From MIT:
'This tech millionaire went from covid trial funder to misinformation superspreader'

From Reuters:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-usa-idUSL1N2QP18K/ 

It's a common tactic to attack the author rather than refute the content.
Try refuting the content.
Remember that the jab manufacturers are very wealthy and powerful and will do anything to defend their product, even when proven liable. As AstraZeneca would rather do, as the UK's first £200 billion company, rather than pay the Jab injured what they are due.
Kirsh is a very bright chap, worth listening to.

[papasmurf]

FFS, it ONLY mentions 'serious' adverse events, it did not look at other events, because it's not a study of adverse events.  And just because they say they are not serious events does not mean it's true.  What they call minor could in fact be serious, because it doesn't provide a definition.

"In this review, we discuss design and self-assembly of mRNA vaccines.  We highlight the materials commonly utilized to deliver mRNA, their physicochemical characteristics, and other relevant considerations, such as mRNA optimization, routes of administration, cellular fate, and immune activation, that are important for successful mRNA vaccination."

Look if there were ANY very serious effects in any quantity it would be logged and reported.

[Scott777]

FFS, It is a comprehensive and detailed explanation,  side effects are a minor part of it.

FFS, it ONLY mentions 'serious' adverse events, it did not look at other events, because it's not a study of adverse events.  And just because they say they are not serious events does not mean it's true.  What they call minor could in fact be serious, because it doesn't provide a definition.

"In this review, we discuss design and self-assembly of mRNA vaccines.  We highlight the materials commonly utilized to deliver mRNA, their physicochemical characteristics, and other relevant considerations, such as mRNA optimization, routes of administration, cellular fate, and immune activation, that are important for successful mRNA vaccination."

[Scott777]

UPDATE

Unlike some people of this forum, I'm prepared to hold my hands up and say when the info might not be as solid as it first appeared.  It's a shame not everyone can admit that.

John Campbell has removed his video, pending verification, which does lead me to question the journal.  However, I posted it based on an AI search engine result, which said it was peer reviewed at the time.  Now it does not!

That said, it still wouldn't surprise me at all if it's true, given the technology that had been researched and developed in recent years, and the links between Bill Gates, vaccines, nanotech and profiteering from bad health.

[papasmurf]

Why would there be?  That was Jan 2021, and it's not a study of side effects.

FFS, It is a comprehensive and detailed explanation,  side effects are a minor part of it.

Excess deaths are now dropping in England and Wales:-
Graph at link,
Excess deaths England and Wales 2024 | Statista

Weekly number of excess deaths in England and Wales 2020-2024

Published by Statista Research Department, Sep 4, 2024

For the week ending August 23, 2024, weekly deaths in England and Wales were below the number expected at -1,368 excess deaths. In late 2022, and through early 2023, excess deaths were elevated for a number of weeks, with the excess deaths figure for the week ending January 13, 2023, the highest since February 2021. In the middle of April 2020, at the height of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, there were almost 12,000 excess deaths a week recorded in England and Wales. It was not until two months later, in the week ending June 19, 2020, that the number of deaths began to be lower than the five-year average for the corresponding week. 

[Scott777]

There are no major side effects reported in that very detailed and interesting article.

Why would there be?  That was Jan 2021, and it's not a study of side effects.

[Unlucky4Sum]

It is peer reviewed, I don't see what copyright has got to do with anything, or why the author needs to be an expert on vaccines.  And there's nothing fantastical about self-assembling mRNA vaccines.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7837307/

It is NOT peer reviewed it has been put out for review in the augustly titled but misleading 'International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research' which turns out to be a junk web site pretending to be an important reference but has only had a handful of articles in its 4 years of existence https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/issue/archive  

And I notice you cannot explain why the only medical person behind that article is a gynaecologist not a vaccine specialist and one that doesn't think it's worth mentioning on her own web site. 

And to crown it all the video you linked to has been deleted by its author.  Maybe he realises the paper he spoke of was utter bilge, certainly doesn't want people to associate him with referencing it anymore..

[Unlucky4Sum]

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-new-zealand-covid-vaccine-data

That is not a New Zealand article it is just another piece by that widely discredited nutjob Steve Kirsh

From MIT:
'This tech millionaire went from covid trial funder to misinformation superspreader'

From Reuters:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-usa-idUSL1N2QP18K/  

[papasmurf]

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-new-zealand-covid-vaccine-data

There is an increased mortality in Britain BUT there are a lot of factors involved in that. Blaming vaccinations for it is frankly spin.