Time for change?

[Borg Refinery]

Ok let's see if this works 



This image is attached as an attachment, it displays fine so far.......

Look, here's a second image of the screenshot of me attaching it -

[Unlucky4Sum]

That's because I was referring to being able to load images without using a URL reference.

Could do it last week, can't so easily now. 

[Borg Refinery]

Test



Yup, works fine..

[Borg Refinery]

The site is working perfectly well for me now and looks better than before, thank you, Nick, for bringing the site back to life and updating it




I've embedded images in a couple of posts here already, it's working absolutely fine for me folks. You simply go to a site like http://imgbb.com, upload your image and take the link and put it in a post.

Or alternatively, you can click on the 'insert an image' button near the 'Quick Reply' box at the bottom and put the direct link to the image [ie http://site.com/whatever.jpg] in the box that comes up, after clicking said button

It couldn't be simpler. And below is a test:

[Nick]

Actually I take some of that back

Those image options don't seem to be working after the update

I only have my phone but I know images have been added since update so I know it works. 

[Borg Refinery]

Who mentioned banning?

Ok, so what else did you mean by 'early bath'?

I assume that refers to at least a temporary ban does it not? What else did you have in mind?

[Unlucky4Sum]

Actually I take some of that back

Those image options don't seem to be working after the update

[Unlucky4Sum]

You can post pictures just the same as before, you drag what ever picture you want to post to the bit that says 'Drag and drop here'.

Exactly and Scott can copy and paste via the 'printscreen' option (and Windows 11 lets you post just the bit you want)  and then there's options like imgur.com.

Scott says he has a Pfizer document dated Feb 2021 that says there vaccine is experimental.  Google desn't back that story, the FDA doesn't back that story and the UK regulatory authority doesn't back it either MHRA link

The obvious conclusion is Scott has either misread or misrepresented the truth

[Nick]

Not an expert at this new forum format which does not give me the option to post a picture from my PC.  So, how would you like me to show you?

You can post pictures just the same as before, you drag what ever picture you want to post to the bit that says 'Drag and drop here'. 

[Scott777]

It is not a case of me never wanting to be wrong, I merely wish anti-vaxxers who rabbit on about Covid vaccines causing people to drop dead faster than British soldiers charging German machine guns in the 1st World War would back their contentions up with some credible data sets to prove it.

What are you talking about?  A data set of the NHS lying about the experimental status?  If there were some way to post the image or video, I would.

[Scott777]

So you're supposed to be such an expert but you can't put up this evidence.

Not an expert at this new forum format which does not give me the option to post a picture from my PC.  So, how would you like me to show you?

Here's the FDA 2 months before Feb 2021 giving 'emergency' clearance for that Pfizer vaccine and look, the word 'experimental' doesn't appear.

It also doesn't show the word "truth", so does that mean it's not the truth?  Anyway, this is for the US authorisation, but I am talking about the NHS giving false information, so obviously the UK, which did not give Emergency Use Authorization.  It gave Conditional Marketing Authorisation.  So to confirm, you haven't said what your source is that it was not experimental.

Here's FullFAct in that very Feb 2021 proving (but said in politer terms) that the 'experimental' accusation is a crock of shit put about by sad losers.  https://fullfact.org/online/covid-vaccines-not-medical-experiment/

Is that it?  Your only source of truth is FullofshitFAct?  And what qualifies them as a source of facts?
[/quote]

[papasmurf]

What, you mean you don't know what it means to document something?  Blimey.  Just get a dictionary.  Of course you don't want there to be any evidence, because you never want to be wrong.

It is not a case of me never wanting to be wrong, I merely wish anti-vaxxers who rabbit on about Covid vaccines causing people to drop dead faster than British soldiers charging German machine guns in the 1st World War would back their contentions up with some credible data sets to prove it.

[Scott777]

So no documentary evidence.

What, you mean you don't know what it means to document something?  Blimey.  Just get a dictionary.  Of course you don't want there to be any evidence, because you never want to be wrong.

[Unlucky4Sum]

Phase 3 was required to remove the experimental status, so your "substantial testing" is irrelevant.

I have a screenshot and a screen video of the Pfizer in Feb 2021, but don't know how to post it.

So you're supposed to be such an expert but you can't put up this evidence.  How beleivable (not)

Here's the FDA 2 months before Feb 2021 giving 'emergency' clearance for that Pfizer vaccine and look, the word 'experimental' doesn't appear.

Here's FullFAct in that very Feb 2021 proving (but said in politer terms) that the 'experimental' accusation is a crock of shit put about by sad losers.  https://fullfact.org/online/covid-vaccines-not-medical-experiment/

https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download

'The vaccination programme is not an experiment. The three Covid vaccines currently approved for use in the UK have already been shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials.'


A problem here is we can't actually prove any one specific case where someone died because of anti vaccine horseshit like you spread but statistically we know that very many did.

[papasmurf]

Voice and video recordings.

So no documentary evidence.